A historical inventory: How the “conspiracy theory meme” was de facto intentionally created and utilised by govermental think-tanks in order to steer public discourse
Professor Lance deHaven-Smith (professor emeritus of political science at Florida State University) writes the following about the history of the “conspiracy theory ” in his peer-reviewed book entitled which was published by the University of Texas Press in 2013:
Der Begriff "Verschwörungstheorie" wurde 1964 von der CIA erfunden und in den öffentlichen Diskurs eingebracht, um die vielen Skeptiker zu diskreditieren, die die Schlussfolgerung der Warren-Kommission anzweifelten, dass Präsident John F. Kennedy von einem einsamen Schützen namens Lee Harvey Oswald ermordet wurde, der selbst in Polizeigewahrsam ermordet wurde, bevor er befragt werden konnte. Die CIA nutzte ihre Freunde in den Medien, um eine Kampagne zu starten, die den Verdacht gegen den Bericht der Warren-Kommission zur Zielscheibe von Spott und Anfeindungen machte. Diese Kampagne war "eine der erfolgreichsten Propaganda-Initiativen aller Zeiten".
For detailed information the see the attached official CIA document which was released in response to a 1976 FOIA request by the New York Times. The document shows how the term “conspiracy” was intentionally utilised to prevent critical rational analysis and “dissenting perspectives”.
In his book Professor Lance deHaven-Smith provides further historical facts on how the CIA succeeded in manipulating public opinions and how they created an uncritical, reflexive, automatic, stigmatization in the public mind towards those who challenge official government explanations (i.e., the systematic use of social exclusion and ostracism based on linguistic labeling and social categorisation).
Der Begriff "Verschwörungstheorie" als Werkzeug der kulturellen Hegemonie:
Eine kritische Diskursanalyse
Eine kürzlich als Dissertation veröffentlichte systematische Diskursanalyse untermauert diese Analyse mit Belegen aus einer Vielzahl von Quellen.
2018). The conspiracy theory meme as a tool of cultural hegemony: A critical discourse analysis. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering
. (Abstract (Zusammenfassung)
Diejenigen, die die offiziellen Darstellungen von bedeutenden verdächtigen und einschneidenden Ereignissen ablehnen, werden oft als Verschwörungstheoretiker bezeichnet und die alternativen Erklärungen, die sie vorschlagen, werden oft als Verschwörungstheorien bezeichnet. Diese Etiketten werden oft verwendet, um die Überzeugungen derjenigen Individuen abzutun, die die potenziell hegemoniale Kontrolle darüber, was die Menschen glauben, in Frage stellen. Das Konzept der Verschwörungstheorie fungiert als ein Hindernis für die legitime diskursive Auseinandersetzung mit Verschwörungsverdächtigungen. Die Wirkung des Etiketts scheint selbst die angesehensten Denker zu behindern. Dieses Hindernis ist besonders problematisch in der Wissenschaft, wo eine gründliche, objektive Analyse von Informationen entscheidend für die Aufdeckung der Wahrheit ist und wo Mitglieder der Wissenschaft typischerweise als eine der wichtigsten epistemischen Autoritäten angesehen werden. Diese Dissertation verfolgte die Entwicklung und Verwendung solcher Begriffe als Pejorative, die verwendet werden, um kritisches Denken, Analyse und Infragestellung der Autorität zu unterbinden. Dies wurde mit Hilfe der kritischen Diskursanalyse als Forschungsmethode erreicht. In den zeitgenössischen Medien wurden Beweise gefunden, die darauf hindeuten, dass Regierungsvertreter maßgeblich an der Schaffung des pejorativen Mems Verschwörungstheoretiker beteiligt waren. Das Nachverfolgen der Entwicklung des Verschwörungstheorie-Memes und seiner Verwendung als pejorativer Schalldämpfer kann das Bewusstsein für seine Verwendung auf diese Art und Weise schärfen und seine Auswirkungen vermindern.
- URL: https://www.proquest.com/openview/55ccdf26dcda24e7190a0e99ffb88a87/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
- Free access PDF: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322682499
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1080/13569775.2010.523939
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
URL: https://zero.sci-hub.ru/4203/d9fc53386d750041db5a26ed22c79a48/dehaven-smith2010.pdf#navpanes=0&view=FitH
Here is a classical epistemological (philosophical) argument which concisely highlights the importance of free access to information (e.g., free press, media, and internet):
Nihil est in intellectu quod non sit prius in sensu
(Transl.: Nothing is in the intellect that was not first in the senses)
This postulate is known as the “Aristotelian Peripatetic Axiom” and it highlights the importance of information (input) for reasoning and knowledge. To put it simply, if information (which is perceived through the senses, e.g., eyes and ears) is not available to us, then we obviously cannot think about it. Accordingly, knowledge is fundamentally based on information. The opposite of knowing is nescience (ne-science = not knowing). The human mind is thus furnished by sensory impressions which in turn form the basis of ideas. In other words, the data which impinges on our sensory organs “determines” our worldview (i.e., our holistic perspective on reality; a Gestalt; German: Weltanschauung). Ergo, the peripatetic axiom is obviously of great pertinence in the context of the “information revolution” (the information age). Per analogiam to the agricultural revolution and industrial revolution, the digital revolution heralded the beginning of the information revolution. According to this ancient principle, any form of information censorship is thus a limitation of possible knowledge. In addition, the selective propagation of information can be used to create specific worldviews in the human mind (cf. cybernetics).
This ancient axiom of how the mind is furnished has been corroborated by fundamental research in 20th century neuroscience. For instance, the path-breaking work by Donald Hebb emphasises the importance of experience in learning. The neuronal circuitry in our brain is “wired” by incoming information. The Hebbian mantra is: “Cells that fire together wire together“.
Connected cells become engrams. Multiple cells become cell assemblies. Hebb stated the following to describe his approach:
“The general idea is an old one, that any two cells or systems of cells that are repeatedly active at the same time will tend to become ‘associated’ so that activity in one facilitates activity in the other.”(1949, p.70)
He wrote further:
“When one cell repeatedly assists in firing another, the axon of the first cell develops synaptic knobs (or enlarges them if they already exist) in contact with the soma of the second cell.” (op. cit. p.63)
In other words, repetition of specific information consolidates specific information processing pathways in the brain (per analogiam to a path in a forest which becomes more defined and more widely used the more people walk people walk on it, similarly, the ocean washes specific grooves into cliffs over elongated periods of time). Thus, our worldview is shaped by the information we are exposed to. Again, it is thus possible to “design” the available information in such a way that it creates a specific worldview (via neuro/synapto-plastic changes in the brain via the associative neuronal process of “long term potentiation”). Repetition is a key concept. The German propaganda expert Joseph Goebbels (who studied Bernays work on propaganda) understood this principle intuitively. He stated “If a lie is repeated often enough it becomes true”. The manipulative and highly centralised mass-media (see Prof. Noam Chomsky) makes systematic usage of this principle. Think about the almost hypnotic repetition of the term “weapons of mass-destruction” before the invasion of Iraq (which later turned out to be a complete lie – but by then the imprint in the public mind was already created and extinction is a cumbersome process).
Interestingly in the broader context at hand, Hebb had close ties with the CIA and his methods were applied for the amoral and inhuman KUBARK torture manual of the CIA which was recently declassified. Sensory deprivation is one of several torture methods to “break down the psyche of human beings” discussed in this manual. Hebb participated in the CIA project “Bluebird” (which had the objective to make people “sing like a bluebird” even against their will). Project Bluebird was the predecessor of Project Artichoke which was then preceded by the notorious MK-Utra program which, inter alia, tested psychedelics compounds on non-consenting naïve populations (prisoners, mental patients, homeless, etc.). Hebb’s work thus laid the groundwork for later CIA programs which were primarily concerned with the manipulating the human mind (and consequently human behaviour).
Hebb’s Rule can be mathematically generalized as follows:
or the change in the ith synaptic weight wi is equal to a learning rate η times the ith input xi times the postsynaptic response y.
Often cited is the case of a linear neuron as:
The crux of the argument is that the brain learns by repetition and that information shapes our brain and hence our worldview (our mental model of reality).
Nihil est in intellectu quod non sit prius in sensu
(Transl.: Nothing is in the intellect that was not first in the senses)
, 43(2), 205–213.
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1002/jhbs.20225
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
, 43(4), 401–417.
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1002/jhbs.20271
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
, 51(30)
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1037/a0003712
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
, 63(4), 633.
Plain numerical DOI: 10.2307/1418888
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
, 1(2), 43–47.
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1016/S0950-5601(53)80053-5
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
Open the application fullscreen mode for optimal graphical performance
, 2(11), 1019–1025.
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1038/14819
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
, 11(12), 520–527.
Plain numerical DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.009
DOI URL
directSciHub download
Show/hide publication abstract
, 11(10), 1129–35. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18828191
Show/hide publication abstract

- Bernays, E. L. (1928). Propaganda. Horace Liveright.
- Bernays, E. L. (1936). Freedom of Propaganda. Vital Speeches of the Day, 2(24), 744–746.
- L’Etang, J. (1999). The father of spin: Edward L. Bernays and the birth of public relations. Public Relations Review, 25(1), 123–124.

- Lippmann, W. (1920). Liberty and the News. Museum.
- Lippmann, W. (1970). The Phantom Public. Politics.

- Clark, M. W. (2006). Hero or villain? Bertolt Brecht and the crisis surrounding June 1953. Journal of Contemporary History.
- Hunt, T. C. N.-. (2004). Goodbye to Berlin: For 200 years, German thinkers have shaped British intellectual life - but their influence is fading fast. The Guardian.
